This documentation is for WSO2 Identity Server 5.3.0 . View documentation for the latest release.

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Both SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token types are supported by default. The issued token type is decided based on the type of token defined in the RST (Request Security Token). Currently, the Bearer Subject Confirmation and Holder-Of-Key subject confirmation methods are both , which are explained below, are supported. With Holder-Of-Key, both Symmetric and Asymmetric key types are supported. You can obtain tokens containing claims that hold certain information about the subject. These claims can be extracted from the profiles or through custom claim callbacks which can be registered to the Carbon runtime.

Understanding different confirmation methods

Subject confirmation methods are how a relying party (or the end service) can make sure that a particular security token issued by a Security Token Service (STS), is brought by the legitimate subject. If this is not done, a third party can take the token from the wire and send any request it wants including that token. As a result, the relying party may trust that illegitimate third party.

The following are the three methods of confirmation.

  • Bearer: This is actually not a confirmation method as subject confirmation is not really needed. The relying party simply trusts whoever brings the token.
  • Holder of Key (HoK):
    • STS includes the public key of the client inside the security token and signs it.
    • Before sending the token, the client itself signs the request.
    • When the relying party receives the token, it first validates the STS signature and then validates the client's signature with the public key embedded inside the token.
  • Sender Vouches:
    • Rather than authenticating with the STS, the client authenticates with an intermediate service.
    • The intermediary gets the security token from the STS and signs the request before sending it to the relying party.
    • The relying party trusts both the intermediary and the STS. So, it validates both of them.


Panel
titleRelated Topics